Connect with us

Opinion: Why Chelsea’s ideal formation is not the two being used right now

Frank Lampard

Opinions

Opinion: Why Chelsea’s ideal formation is not the two being used right now

It is all rather experimental for Frank Lampard and Chelsea right now, which is quite natural when you add a high number of new players to your starting line up.

Lampard has so far this season mainly opted to use the 4-2-3-1 formation. But against Manchester United at the weekend, he went there and tried to contain with a 3-4-3 formation.

Whilst I don’t dislike the 4-2-3-1, I am not a fan of the 3-4-3 and believe it is not needed. Chelsea drew 0-0 against a very good Sevilla side playing the 4-2-3-1, with the defence looking just as stable as they did against United.

Now, this is vital for Lampard right now, shoring up the defence. It has been a massive problem since the start of last season, so it is very refreshing to see three clean sheets in the last four matches.

However, now is the time to work on the balance between attack and defence, and I can only see the 4-3-3 option being best to use for this.

Not only will this give Chelsea the balance between transition, it will also bring the very best out of N’Golo Kante.

I believe Lampard should line up like this for his strongest starting Xl in 4-3-3 –

Mendy, James, Zouma, Silva, Chilwell. Kante, Kovacic (Jorginho), Havertz (Mount). Pulisic (Hudson-Odoi), Ziyech, Werner.

Ben Chilwell, Thiago Silva, and Edouard Mendy have been massive in making the defensive difference for Chelsea, not so much with the formation and line up. This is why we need to use the 4-3-3.

What it does it give us extra defensive stability with that holding midfielder, and if Kante can stay disciplined and avoid the natural urge to surge, he can become very good in this role at this stage of his career. Breaking up play, tackling, and providing the support to his defenders that he sits in front of.

Then have Kovacic or Jorginho playing close to him to help break out of a high press, then Havertz slightly ahead of them both to be that creative spark in the middle.

This also allows our full backs to attack as well as defend, with both having the pace and energy to recover as well. Using a 4-3-3 still gives us that extra attacking person to make things happen up front. A 3-4-3 takes that extra attacker out, and it’s not needed.

I agree that we must perfect our defence first, and we have shown signs we are doing this, largely due to personnel, and the dominance and experience of Mendy and Silva at the back.

But just containing in a 3-4-3 is risky, as shown against Manchester United on Saturday. They were there for the taking in the first half, but Chelsea didn’t attack. Then in the second half, United had a few chances to win the game, albeit not for some top saves from Mendy to earn Chelsea a point.

Using a 4-3-3 and play with balance, you are not throwing all your eggs in one basket, and it brings you a much more dynamic and unpredictable setup that can be adaptive to the tide of the game.

 

Continue Reading
2 Comments
guest
2 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ekemini Uko
Ekemini Uko
29 days ago

I totally vibe with this philosophy
Top content

Assorted
Assorted
29 days ago

Nice one. 4-3-3 all the way

More in Opinions

  • Facebook

    Instagram

    Twitter

    Get more stuff

    Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

    Thank you for subscribing. KTBFFH!

    Something went wrong.

    To Top
    2
    0
    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
    ()
    x